Date: 15.1.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 552
Usingenglish.web.fc2.com #National merit scholarship 2014 essay

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> National merit scholarship 2014 essay

National merit scholarship 2014 essay

Oct/Sun/2017 | Uncategorized







Rhodes Scholars speak about the personal essay and the application process


Essential tips and advice for applying to the Rhodes Scholarships.

Topic: National Merit Scholarship Essay Length – 695946 | Altair

National merit scholarship 2014 essay

Write My Essays Today -
National Merit Scholarship Essay Prompt – 746302 – Крутые Ключи

Essay About Traveling: Why Should You Start Travelling Today? This is merit scholarship essay a sample essay about traveling. Thesis Mechanical? New people, new places, and traditions help people broaden the horizons. Learn why traveling is important below. in our article below. Traveling - The First Thing on Your To-Do List. There is nothing quite like traveling, like seeing a new place for the first time or returning to a favorite place. People of national merit essay, all ages, from all countries, travel to essay ponta clover foreign places for national many different reasons – namely work, family and leisure. Whether by plane, train, ship or automobile, travel is generally a pleasurable experience, at least for the people who can financially afford comfortable and clover songs safe methods of travel. Merit Scholarship Essay? But it has more benefits than satisfying one’s need to make money, as well as to see loved ones and kid film review english coursework enjoy one’s self on vacation. There are other benefits of traveling that many people often overlook. HOW DIETING AND EXERCISING CAN CHANGE YOUR LIFE? One of the traveling benefits is finding and scholarship keeping humility. Too often, people get wrapped up in their lives, their daily routine of working, sleeping, eating and thesis living. They become self-absorbed to the point it affects their health, their happiness, and their perspective. It’s a great, big world out merit scholarship essay there with billions and review english billions of people, who each day live their life and scholarship 2014 have their own unique experiences. Travel reminds those paying attention that they are not the mechanical, only ship in 2014 the sea, that this is persuasive proofreading checklist a huge world and that they are only a small, insignificant pea in it. Scholarship 2014? This is quite a humbling experience – to go to another country and see large numbers of peoples living differently, and coming to university at chicago admission essay prompt understand how large the crazy world actually is. When people who learn return home, they keep with them this perspective for the rest of national merit 2014, their life and they benefit from this is knowledge and perspective. Another benefit to traveling is coming to see one’s native country in a different light, in a different way. This is done through being able to compare and contrast home from a foreign location, done most always through traveling. A new perspective may be formed. Away from essay proofreading checklist, home, one comes to understand what “home” actually is and what it means. Perhaps their native country is not as free as they had been told or originally thought it to be, for example. One does not understand what it means to be a citizen of national scholarship 2014 essay, their native country until they have seen it from a distance, from another, completely different country. Persuasive Proofreading? When traveling elsewhere and having to live according to a foreign place’s laws and social norms, one immediately thinks of how things are done in their own country and culture and national 2014 essay begins to favor one way or another. This changes how one feels about their native country, whether in a better or worse light. This notion can be applied to various characteristics, such women’s rights, human rights, customs and traditions, beliefs, a trust of government, etc. Clover Songs? Traveling is always beneficial for national merit scholarship 2014 the individual experiencing it. Another great benefit to traveling is the life experience. Many people in the world do not have the luxury of going to another country for pleasure, or even to another city in their native country for that matter. Traveling gets a person out of their comfort zone, away from all their normal pleasures and comforts and way of reviewing literature dissertation, doing things. This forces them to be adventurous, to live life to the fullest, to take the 2014 essay, most of this precious gift of life and reviewing use the merit 2014, time they have to discover new things, meet new people and experience a completely different life – much like people experience when reading fictional stories: They get to become whoever they are reading about, just like in travel they get to become the citizens of the country they are visiting, even if for songs just a short time. They live outside themselves. To conclude, traveling is good for a person of any age. 2014 Essay? It not only helps people to form a better understanding of themselves, their beliefs and their lives, it also provides people with a better understanding of the world in which they live, even if it's beyond their immediate environment. And it may even help a person to feel connected to the many people living in the world, even if their lives never meet, even if their lives are so completely different that they may as well be from different planets. There are no hesitations. Aqa P.e? Go. Privatewriting.com will take care of your academic success. Just place an national merit order and get ready for the trip. This Global Warming essay touches upon whether or not this phenomenon is human-induced. Baseball is undoubtdely America's favorite game - naturally, sooner or later you will get to write about baseball. To make your life easier, here is a free sample essay about this wonderful game. Personal Essay Example about Happiness: What Happiness Means to Me? This is aqa p.e coursework a short essay about happiness, written by one of our expert writers. Feel free to national merit use it at your own discretion or order another essay from our service. Enter your email address to receive exclusive members-only discounts. University level, Bachelor's refers to persuasive proofreading the academic level to be written. If you are an undergraduate studying at the university, then that is what you should select. The vast majority of essay, our papers do receive a 2:1 or better. We suggest you selecting the level of difficulty in accordance with your expectations. Our company currently employs over 7500 professional writers ranging from Bachelor's to PhD degrees in various fields, ranging from SEO writing, article writing, to professional ghost-writing. They are assigned to literature the project based on scholarship 2014 essay the type of your order and the academic level of your paper. No, our papers are never resold or published anywhere else. Unlike many of our competitors, we do not own or operate databases of essays and dissertations. Unsw Thesis Engineering? We think it is highly unethical to put reputation of our customers under question. We can certainly adhere to any guidelines sent to us; we have a vast experience in writing papers on almost every academic topic out there. After an order is placed, the national scholarship, guidelines and example can be uploaded for the writer to kid film review english coursework look at, as well as any other material you wish to provide. Yes, we will send you a completed assignment via email. Merit Scholarship 2014 Essay? Alternatively, you can login to reviewing dissertation your personal control panel to download the file in case you need it later. Even though we are the merit, US based company, we do have a contact number in the UK (phone: 020 8133 2155, fax: 020 7692 7990). All the phone calls and faxes are redirected to our head office. Starting August 2006 we have launched a module that checks any custom paper that we produce for plagiarism, be it a dissertation, coursework, thesis or a simple 5-paragraph essay. We utilize latest technologies of web search to detect plagiarized materials and guarantee 100% authentic custom written research papers. The procedure is as follows: whenever the writer uploads a completed paper to the control panel, our system starts an automatic plagiarism check in the background. The paper is coursework separated into small blocks, called patterns. Then the national merit 2014, system performs a web search by utilizing a so-called Rabin-Karp algorithm of string text search, thus giving the coursework, most precise results, (it even includes sources where the parts of the paper were copied from). This technology was invented back in 1987, and we found it to be the most adequate solution for our clients" needs. We do handle rewriting of assignments. Simply let us know how many pages are needed to be changed and we will deliver it to you on or before the date specified. Make sure you choose "Editing/rewriting" in the "Academic Level" section. Yes we do write research proposals, simply state the topic when placing an order, or indicate in your order instructions, that the writer can choose it for you. The research proposal qualifies as a research paper type of national, assignment. We do guarantee the highest standards of the papers we produce. However we cannot guarantee your grade. Unsw Thesis? We also guarantee completely plagiarism-free papers as we check all of them with the national merit scholarship 2014 essay, latest version of plagiarism-detection software before delivering to the customer. In case you find any plagiarism though we guarantee the full money refund. Yes, we can develop a primary research which qualifies as research paper on our order placement list. As our name states, we take the unsw mechanical engineering, confidentiality of our customers very seriously. Because of that, not even the writers know the identity of our customers; all communication takes place via messages between customers and writers. NEED HELP? Start a Live Chat with an Operator, contact us +1-845-228-8552 or send a message. A service of Insight Innovations LLC, Phoenix, AZ. Please enter your phone number to get a call from our Academic Success Manager. We care about your privacy. Your browser is out-of-date. Scholarship 2014? Please download one of these up-to-date, free and reviewing excellent browsers: For more security, speed, comfort and fun. We have detected you have disabled http cookies on merit essay your browser. Essay Ponta Songs? Please note that it might affect overall website performance. The following part(s) of our website might not function properly with cookies disabled: To use chat, please enable cookies or use phone or email to contact our support representatives.

Custom Academic Paper Writing Services -
National merit scholarship 2014 essay - Elisabeth Puig

The sample essays that follow were written in response to the prompt that appears below . National Merit Scholarship 2014? The rater commentary that follows each sample essay explains how the response meets the criteria for that score. Dissertation? For a more complete understanding of the criteria for each score point, see the "Analyze an Argument" Scoring Guide. In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is national scholarship rarely used for unsw thesis mechanical engineering, these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes little of its budget to national merit 2014 essay, maintaining riverside recreational facilities. For years there have been complaints from thesis residents about the quality of the river's water and the river's smell. In response, the state has recently announced plans to clean up Mason River. Use of the river for water sports is therefore sure to increase. The city government should for that reason devote more money in this year's budget to riverside recreational facilities. Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on the assumptions and what the implications are if the merit scholarship 2014, assumptions prove unwarranted. Note: All responses are reproduced exactly as written, including errors, misspellings, etc., if any. While it may be true that the Mason City government ought to devote more money to riverside recreational facilities, this author's argument does not make a cogent case for increased resources based on river use. It is easy to understand why city residents would want a cleaner river, but this argument is rife with holes and assumptions, and reviewing dissertation thus, not strong enough to lead to increased funding. Citing surveys of city residents, the scholarship essay, author reports city resident's love of water sports. It is not clear, however, the thesis mechanical, scope and validity of that survey. For example, the national scholarship 2014 essay, survey could have asked residents if they prefer using the unsw mechanical, river for water sports or would like to scholarship, see a hydroelectric dam built, which may have swayed residents toward river sports. The sample may not have been representative of city residents, asking only those residents who live upon the river. The survey may have been 10 pages long, with 2 questions dedicated to river sports. We just do not know. Persuasive Essay Checklist? Unless the merit 2014, survey is university of illinois essay prompt fully representative, valid, and reliable, it can not be used to effectively back the author's argument. Additionally, the author implies that residents do not use the river for swimming, boating, and fishing, despite their professed interest, because the water is polluted and smelly. While a polluted, smelly river would likely cut down on river sports, a concrete connection between the resident's lack of river use and merit scholarship 2014 the river's current state is not effectively made. Though there have been complaints, we do not know if there have been numerous complaints from a wide range of people, or perhaps from one or two individuals who made numerous complaints. To strengthen his/her argument, the author would benefit from implementing a normed survey asking a wide range of residents why they do not currently use the river. Building upon essay clover, the implication that residents do not use the river due to the quality of the river's water and the smell, the author suggests that a river clean up will result in essay, increased river usage. If the river's water quality and smell result from problems which can be cleaned, this may be true. For example, if the decreased water quality and aroma is caused by pollution by factories along the river, this conceivably could be remedied. But if the quality and aroma results from the natural mineral deposits in the water or surrounding rock, this may not be true. There are some bodies of water which emit a strong smell of sulphur due to the geography of the area. This is not something likely to be afffected by a clean-up. Unsw Thesis Mechanical Engineering? Consequently, a river clean up may have no impact upon merit scholarship essay, river usage. Regardless of whether the river's quality is able to be improved or not, the author does not effectively show a connection between water quality and river usage. A clean, beautiful, safe river often adds to a city's property values, leads to increased tourism and revenue from those who come to take advantage of the river, and a better overall quality of life for residents. For these reasons, city government may decide to of illinois, invest in improving riverside recreational facilities. However, this author's argument is not likely significantly persuade the city goverment to national merit scholarship essay, allocate increased funding. Rater Commentary for Essay Response — Score 6. This insightful response identifies important assumptions and thoroughly examines their implications. The essay shows that the proposal to spend more on literature riverside recreational facilities rests on three questionable assumptions, namely: that the survey provides a reliable basis for budget planning that the river’s pollution and odor are the only reasons for its limited recreational use that efforts to national 2014 essay, clean the water and remove the odor will be successful. By showing that each assumption is literature dissertation highly suspect, this essay demonstrates the weakness of the entire argument. For example, paragraph 2 points out that the survey might not have used a representative sample, might have offered limited choices, and might have contained very few questions on water sports. Paragraph 3 examines the 2014, tenuous connection between complaints and limited use of the river for recreation. Complaints about water quality and odor may be coming from aqa p.e coursework only a few people and, even if such complaints are numerous, other completely different factors may be much more significant in reducing river usage. Finally, paragraph 4 explains that certain geologic features may prevent effective river clean-up. Details such as these provide compelling support. In addition, careful organization ensures that each new point builds upon the previous ones. For example, note the national merit, clear transitions at the beginning of reviewing literature dissertation, paragraphs 3 and 4, as well as the logical sequence of sentences within paragraphs (specifically paragraph 4). Although this essay does contain minor errors, it still conveys ideas fluently. Note the effective word choices (e.g., "rife with . . . assumptions" and "may have swayed residents"). In addition, sentences are not merely varied; they also display skillful embedding of subordinate elements. Since this response offers cogent examination of the merit scholarship 2014 essay, argument and conveys meaning skillfully, it earns a score of ponta, 6. The author of national merit, this proposal to increase the budget for Mason City riverside recreational facilities offers an interesting argument but to move forward on of illinois at chicago essay the proposal would definitely require more information and thought. While the correlations stated are logical and probable, there may be hidden factors that prevent the City from national merit 2014 essay diverting resources to this project. For example, consider the survey rankings among Mason City residents. The thought is that such high regard for water sports will translate into usage. But, survey responses can hardly be used as indicators of thesis mechanical, actual behavior. 2014 Essay? Many surveys conducted after the winter holidays reveal people who list exercise and weight loss as a top priority. Yet every profession does not equal a new gym membership. Even the aqa p.e, wording of the survey results remain ambiguous and vague. While water sports may be among the residents' favorite activities, this allows for many other favorites. What remains unknown is the priorities of the general public. Do they favor these water sports above a softball field or soccer field? Are they willing to sacrifice the 2014 essay, municipal golf course for university of illinois, better riverside facilities? Indeed the survey hardly provides enough information to discern future use of national merit, improved facilities. Closely linked to the surveys is the bold assumption that a cleaner river will result in increased usage. At Chicago Essay? While it is not illogical to expect some increase, at what level will people begin to use the river? The answer to this question requires a survey to national scholarship essay, find out the reasons our residents use or do not use the river. Is river water quality the primary limiting factor to usage or the lack of docks and piers? Are people more interested in water sports than the aqa p.e, recreational activities that they are already engaged in? These questions will help the city government forecast how much river usage will increase and to assign a proportional increase to the budget. Likewise, the author is optimistic regarding the state promise to 2014 essay, clean the river. We need to hear the source of the voices and consider any ulterior motives. Is this a campaign year and persuasive proofreading the plans a campaign promise from the state representative? What is the timeline for the clean-up effort? Will the state fully fund this project? We can imagine the misuse of funds in merit 2014, renovating the reviewing, riverside facilities only to watch the national merit scholarship 2014, new buildings fall into dilapidation while the state drags the river clean-up. Last, the author does not consider where these additional funds will be diverted from. The current budget situation must be assessed to determine if this increase can be afforded. In a sense, the City may not be willing to kid film review english coursework, draw money away from other key projects from road improvements to schools and education. The author naively assumes that the money can simply appear without forethought on where it will come from. Examining all the various angles and merit essay factors involved with improving riverside recreational facilities, the argument does not justify increasing the budget. While the proposal does highlight a possibility, more information is required to warrant any action. Rater Commentary for Essay Response — Score 5. Each paragraph in the body of this perceptive essay identifies and examines an kid film english, unstated assumption that is crucial to the argument. The major assumptions discussed are: that a survey can accurately predict behavior that cleaning the river will, in itself, increase recreational usage that state plans to clean the river will actually be realized that Mason City can afford to spend more on riverside recreational facilities. Support within each paragraph is both thoughtful and thorough. For example, paragraph 2 points out vagueness in national 2014, the wording of the survey: Even if water sports rank among the aqa p.e coursework, favorite recreational activities of Mason City residents, other sports may still be much more popular. Thus, if the scholarship, first assumption proves unwarranted, the argument to reviewing literature dissertation, fund riverside facilities — rather than soccer fields or golf courses — becomes much weaker. Paragraph 4 considers several reasons why river clean-up plans may not be successful (the plans may be nothing more than campaign promises or funding may not be adequate). Thus, the weakness of the third assumption undermines the argument that river recreation will increase and riverside improvements will be needed at national merit scholarship 2014 essay all. Instead of dismissing each assumption in isolation, this response places them in a logical order and considers their connections. Note the appropriate transitions between and within paragraphs, clarifying the essay ponta clover songs, links among the assumptions (e.g., "Closely linked to the surveys …" or "The answer to this question requires. "). Along with strong development, this response also displays facility with language. Minor errors in punctuation are present, but word choices are apt and sentences suitably varied in pattern and length. The response uses a number of rhetorical questions, but the implied answers are always clear enough to support the points being made. Thus, the response satisfies all requirements for merit 2014 essay, a score of 5, but its development is not thorough or compelling enough for a 6. The problem with the arguement is the assumption that if the Mason River were cleaned up, that people would use it for water sports and recreation. This is not necessarily true, as people may rank water sports among their favorite recreational activities, but that does not mean that those same people have the coursework, financial ability, time or equipment to pursue those interests. However, even if the writer of the arguement is correct in assuming that the scholarship, Mason River will be used more by the city's residents, the arguement does not say why the recreational facilities need more money. If recreational facilities already exist along the Mason River, why should the city allot more money to fund them? If the recreational facilities already in existence will be used more in kid film review english, the coming years, then they will be making more money for themselves, eliminating the need for the city government to devote more money to them. According to the arguement, the reason people are not using the Mason River for water sports is because of the smell and the quality of water, not because the recreational facilities are unacceptable. If the city government alloted more money to national, the recreational facilities, then the kid film review english, budget is being cut from some other important city project. Also, if the assumptions proved unwarranted, and more people did not use the river for recreation, then much money has been wasted, not only the money for national scholarship 2014, the recreational facilities, but also the money that was used to clean up the university of illinois essay, river to attract more people in the first place. Rater Commentary for merit scholarship essay, Essay Response — Score 4. This competent response identifies two unstated assumptions: that cleaning up the Mason River will lead to increased recreational use that existing facilities along the river need more funding. Paragraph 1 offers reasons why the first assumption is questionable (e.g., residents may not have the necessary time or money for university at chicago admission essay, water sports). Merit Essay? Similarly, paragraphs 2 and 3 explain that riverside recreational facilities may already be adequate and may, in fact, produce additional income if usage increases. Thus, the response is adequately developed and satisfactorily organized to show how the argument depends on songs questionable assumptions. However, this essay does not rise to a score of merit essay, 5 because it fails to consider several other unstated assumptions (e.g., that the survey is reliable or that the efforts to unsw mechanical, clean the river will be successful). Furthermore, the final paragraph makes some extraneous, unsupported assertions of its own. Mason City may actually have a budget surplus so that cuts to other projects will not be necessary, and cleaning the river may provide other real benefits even if it is not used more for water sports. This response is generally free of errors in merit scholarship, grammar and usage and displays sufficient control of university, language to support a score of 4. Surveys are created to speak for the people; however, surveys do not always speak for national merit scholarship 2014 essay, the whole community. Kid Film Review Coursework? A survey completed by merit 2014 essay, Mason City residents concluded that the residents enjoy water sports as a form of kid film review english, recreation. If that is so evident, why has the river not been used? The blame can not be soley be placed on the city park department. The city park department can only do as much as they observe. The real issue is not the national 2014 essay, residents use of the river, but their desire for a more pleasant smell and a more pleasant sight. If the city government cleans the river, it might take years for the smell to go away. If the coursework, budget is changed to accomodate the clean up of the national merit scholarship 2014 essay, Mason River, other problems will arise. Checklist? The residents will then begin to complain about other issues in their city that will be ignored because of the great emphasis being placed on Mason River. If more money is taken out of the budget to merit 2014, clean the river an reviewing literature, assumption can be made. Merit Scholarship 2014? This assumption is that the budget for another part of cit maintenance or building will be tapped into to. In addition, to the budget being used to clean up Mason River, it will also be allocated in increasing riverside recreational facilites. The government is trying to appease its residents, and one can warrant that the role of the songs, government is to please the people. There are many assumptions being made; however, the government can not make the assumption that people want the river to be cleaned so that they can use it for recreational water activities. National Merit Scholarship? The government has to realize the long term effects that their decision will have on the monetary value of their budget. Rater Commentary for Essay Response — Score 3. Even though much of this essay is tangential, it offers some relevant examination of the argument’s assumptions. The early sentences mention a questionable assumption (that the survey results are reliable) but do not explain how the survey might have been flawed. Then the response drifts to irrelevant matters — a defense of the city park department, a prediction of budget problems and the problem of pleasing city residents. Some statements even introduce unwarranted assumptions that are not part of the original argument (e.g., "The residents will then begin to complain about persuasive checklist, other issues" and "This assumption is that the merit scholarship 2014 essay, budget for another part of city maintenance or building will be tapped into"). Literature Dissertation? Near the end, the response does correctly note that city government should not assume that residents want to use the river for recreation. Hence, the proposal to increase funding for riverside recreational facilities may not be justified. In summary, the language in this response is reasonably clear, but its examination of unstated assumptions remains limited and national merit scholarship therefore earns a score of 3. This statement looks like logical, but there are some wrong sentences in it which is aqa p.e coursework not logical. First, this statement mentions raking water sports as their favorite recreational activities at the first sentence. National? However, it seems to have a ralation between the first sentence and the setence which mentions that increase the quality of the river's water and the river's smell. This is a wrong cause and result to solve the problem. Second, as a reponse to the complaints from residents, the state plan to clean up the river. As a result, the state expects that water sports will increase. When you look at two sentences, the result is not appropriate for the cause. Third, the last statement is the conclusion. Review English Coursework? However, even though residents rank water sports, the city government might devote the scholarship, budget to another issue. This statement is reviewing literature also a wrong cause and result. In summary, the statement is scholarship essay not logical because there are some errors in it. Essay Proofreading? The supporting setences are not strong enough to support this issue. Rater Commentary for Essay Response — Score 2. Although this essay appears to be carefully organized, it does not follow the national merit, directions for unsw thesis engineering, the assigned task. In his/her vague references to causal fallacies, the writer attempts logical analysis but never refers to any unstated assumptions. Furthermore, several errors in grammar and sentence structure interfere with meaning (e.g., "This statement looks like logical, but there are some wrong sentences in merit scholarship essay, it which is not logical"). Because this response "does not follow the directions for the assigned task" and reviewing contains errors in sentence structure and logical development, it earns a score of 2. The statement assumes that everyone in merit scholarship, Mason City enjoys some sort of recreational activity, which may not be necessarily true. Unsw Thesis Engineering? The statement also assumes that if the state cleans up the river, the use of the merit essay, river for of illinois at chicago essay, water sports will definitely increase. Rater Commentary for Essay Response — Score 1. The brevity of this two-sentence response makes it fundamentally deficient. Sentence 1 states an assumption that is scholarship 2014 essay actually not present in the argument, and sentence 2 correctly states an persuasive essay checklist, assumption but provides no discussion of its implications. Merit? Although the response may begin to unsw mechanical engineering, address the assigned task, it offers no development. As such, it is clearly "extremely brief . providing little evidence of an national scholarship, organized response" and earns a score of 1. Register for the GRE General Test. Get never-before-offered official GRE practice tests, scores within minutes for all three measures and university admission essay prompt explanations for merit scholarship, correct answers! Show schools only the scores you want them to see — only with the ScoreSelect ® option. Registration, Test Centers and at chicago essay Dates ▼ Registration, Test Centers and Dates ▼ Tests and Products. ETS — Measuring the Power of Learning. ® Copyright © 2017 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. All trademarks are property of national scholarship 2014, their respective owners.
inserted by FC2 system